Roger Singleton - Production lines to product lifecycles, from LCAs and EPDs to CBAM

Despite the clear economic incentives driving LCA adoption, businesses attempting to navigate the landscape independently face a major hurdle: complexity. A medium-complexity industrial component can easily generate over 400 unique data points required to satisfy an EPD standard. Expecting every small and medium-sized enterprise in a global supply chain to master this technical expertise is inefficient. To address this bottleneck, Roger Singleton has created platforms like Riskoa's LCA Factory , and EmVide are working to change the unit economics of environmental reporting. Democratising LCA delivery Rather than forcing clients to deploy large internal teams, software-driven service delivery models allow businesses to access LCA and EPD reporting at palatable unit costs. By combining automated, AI-driven data readiness analysis, gap detection, and modelling assumptions, technology removes the friction from data collection. Moving toward dynamic, real-time reporting Traditionally, an EPD was published once and remained static for up to five years. In a modern business environment where supply chains shift rapidly and technologies like artificial intelligence evolve overnight, static reports quickly become outdated. The future of the sector lies in dynamic reporting. Driven by regulations like CBAM, where carbon pricing changes on a weekly basis, reporting is moving closer to continuous monitoring. "You're actually going to see facility monitoring hardware overlay with LCA capability," Roger explains. "It will end up more that way really, that we're taking more and more physically verified evidence and rapidly translating that into models and information management around emissions." By linking real-time sensor data from factory production lines directly to product batches and border movements, sustainability reporting shifts from a painful annual compliance chore into an automated byproduct of everyday business management.

As sustainability data becomes more granular, internal responsibilities within businesses are shifting. Environmental metrics are no longer confined to an isolated internal green team; they are landing directly on the desks of procurement officers, supply chain managers, and product leads. When commercial buyers evaluate suppliers, they increasingly look for verifiable metrics reported in standardised formats that allow for direct comparability. During an episode of the Sustainability Marketing Survival Conversations podcast, host Simon Badman spoke with Roger Singleton , CEO of Riskoa and creator of the LCA Factory and EmVide . The regulatory stick For businesses ignoring their environmental profile, the legislative landscape has introduced an overwhelming number of regulatory sticks. Rather than relying solely on moral arguments, modern trade rules attach direct economic weight to emissions: Packaging Regulations & EPR: Extended Producer Responsibility schemes penalise companies based on material choices and recyclability. Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Tighter governance frameworks demand transparent supply chain accounting. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAM): Emerging border tariffs mean higher emissions result in direct financial penalties for importers and producers. Decoding the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Among emerging regulations, CBAM stands out as one of the largest trade interventions weighted by environmental impact. Designed to level the playing field between regional producers and international suppliers, CBAM puts an economic price on the embedded carbon of goods crossing a border. In the EU, the first year of operation is underway, and reporting requirements are expanding. Importers of carbon-intensive materials (such as aluminium and steel) face rising quarterly and weekly carbon pricing. In the United Kingdom, the regime takes effect from 1st January; this extends border carbon accounting to align with European standards.  Under this setup, businesses are economically rewarded for lowering their emissions profile and penalised if they fail to manage their supply chain data.

Within many growing businesses, a persistent operational friction can exist between sustainability teams and marketing departments. Sustainability leads are eager to share authentic operational milestones, while marketing teams hesitate out of fear that unverified statements could trigger greenwashing allegations or public backlash Speaking on Sustainability Marketing Survival Conversations, Andrew Sheehan outlined how establishing radical transparency and rigorous verification mechanisms can eliminate this deadlock and build public trust. Personal accountability in comms To counter both greenwashing and greenhushing (going silent out of fear), communications must be rooted in personal accountability. On sustainabilityexamples.com, corporate claims cannot be posted anonymously under a generic brand logo: Signed transparency disclosures: before publishing, organisations sign a formal disclosure confirming that all shared data is true, fair, and complete to the best of their knowledge. Named individual attribution: every published case study is linked directly to a specific individual within the business. Attaching a real person to a claim deters exaggeration and encourages peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.  Safe community environment: providing a platform focused on progress over perfection gives marketers the confidence to communicate transparently without fear of destructive attacks. "The best way to stop greenwashing is to hold people personally accountable," Andrew notes. "When an example goes out, everyone can see who within the organisation was behind the initiative". Third-party verification and AI storytelling To assist businesses in structuring precise, evidence-based copy, Andrew's team developed an AI storyteller that audits drafts for vague phrasing, prompting creators to supply specific metrics and percentages. The AI storytelling assistant scans narrative text to flag ambiguous claims and request precise data points. The team also practice direct supplier verification, where they reach out to third-party installers or vendors to confirm equipment deployment. This process also includes using documented evidence, where invoices, photographic proof, or certificates are checked before a blue-tick verification badge is issued. Through fact-checking and named accountability, organisations can move past defensive silence and communicate their environmental progress with total confidence.

“If it doesn’t bleed, it doesn’t read” was one of the challenges with the media that Andrew Sheehan cited in his interview on Sustainability Marketing Survival Conversations. Good news sustainability impact stories sadly don’t sell. Andrew, Founder and CEO of SustainabilityExamples.com , discovered that when corporate sustainability efforts remain trapped in internal silos or hidden behind expensive association paywalls, overall industry progress stalls. For many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), finding proven environmental solutions traditionally required months of research, expensive memberships, or speculative boardroom guesswork. However, democratising access to real-world case studies could accelerate corporate sustainability and generate direct B2B revenue. Capturing organic demand Globally, the search phrase "sustainability examples" receives approximately 170,000 monthly searches from business leaders, investors, and consumers seeking practical solutions. By creating an open database of verified corporate initiatives, SustainabilityExamples.com connects companies directly with stakeholders searching for active solutions. Croke Park and food waste elimination A prime example of open discovery in action involves Croke Park, Ireland's largest stadium. Seeking to enhance their environmental performance, stadium managers used SustainabilityExamples.com to explore verified vendor solutions. Through the platform, Croke Park discovered Food Site (formerly Positive Carbon), a technology firm specialising in commercial food waste tracking. Because food waste carries a massive carbon footprint, identifying a proven solution immediately shaped Croke Park's next major sustainability initiative, dramatically reducing internal research time and meeting overheads. "Corporate sustainability is a movement, and a movement needs collective knowledge sharing," Andrew emphasises. "When we make solutions visible and discoverable, companies can take action faster and in a safer way". Tracking Marketing KPIs for Sustainability ROI To ensure sustainability efforts deliver clear commercial value, marketers must measure tangible engagement metrics, which SustainabilityExamples.com is able to provide: Industry & department analytics: identifies specific sector leaders and decision-makers viewing corporate initiatives. B2B lead generation: captures direct inbound enquiries from prospective commercial partners. Referral Web Traffic: tracks qualified traffic directed back to the main company domain. Peer upvotes & social proof: measures community endorsement and brand goodwill across the industry. By sharing verified results openly, businesses turn their environmental initiatives into strong drivers of brand equity and commercial growth. This also leads to radical transparency, which we’ll explore in part three.

In corporate communications and business management, sustainability is often mistakenly viewed as a pure cost centre or an optional exercise in virtue signalling. However, framing environmental initiatives purely through a moral lens frequently fails to convince executive leadership teams. During an episode of the Sustainability Marketing Survival Conversations podcast, host Simon Badman spoke with Andrew Sheehan , Founder and CEO of sustainabilityexamples.com . Andrew's path into sustainability was unconventional. Beginning his career as a qualified accountant in Ireland, he developed a deep background in reporting, auditing, and compliance before pivoting into marketing. In 2021, while serving as Head of Marketing for an Irish professional services firm, the birth of his first daughter inspired him to take action. Inspired by UK-based groups using marketing capabilities for good, he decided to pitch a comprehensive corporate sustainability strategy to his leadership team. Selling sustainability as commercial gains to the C-Suite When Andrew initially brought the idea to his executive team, he was met with scepticism. Rather than appealing to ethics alone, he adjusted his strategy and pitched sustainability strictly on commercial gains: Tenders and revenue growth: positioned the organisation to win B2B tenders that mandate ESG criteria. Operational cost reduction: showed long-term financial returns from reduced resource usage and energy efficiency, such as solar panel installations. Brand capital and recruitment: demonstrated how a genuine sustainability narrative attracts top job seekers and builds brand distinction in an AI-driven market. Supply chain alignment: enhanced Scope 3 reporting credentials to become an attractive partner for larger corporate clients. "You need to ensure that within that pitch it complements why it is good for marketing, finance, or HR," Andrew explains. "Marketers are the ones who have to be very good influencers. Making it make commercial sense is how you win". By reframing sustainability as an engine for value creation and brand resilience, businesses can secure leadership buy-in and establish long-term competitive advantages. Overcoming the "Green Ghost" Phenomenon Even with your C-Suite on board and the successful execution of sustainability initiatives, marketers face severe discoverability hurdles. Mainstream media often ignores positive stories because they lack dramatic conflict, while social media algorithms quickly bury announcements. Andrew terms companies caught in this trap "green ghosts", which are businesses doing genuine work that get zero airtime or visibility. The problem sees a business’s corporate website only reaching existing stakeholders, earned media and PR reluctant to cover standard good news, and social media content lifespan dictated by algorithms, resulting in fleeting visibility without sustained ROI. In part two, we’ll discover how Andrew tackled this issue.

Faced with increasing regulatory scrutiny and the threat of public criticism, many organisations have responded by withholding their environmental communications entirely. This practice, known as greenhushing, presents severe risks to corporate reputation and industry progress. According to Lee Green , retreating into silence is an unhelpful response to regulatory pressure. Both greenwashing and greenhushing stem from the same root cause: fear. The cost of corporate silence When responsible organisations stop communicating their authentic progress, the public narrative becomes dominated by negative stories and bad actors. Consequently, overall consumer and stakeholder trust across the entire category declines. "The answer to 'don't overclaim' was never 'say nothing'. It's 'claim precisely'. Stick to the evidence. It's harder, but that's the job," says Lee. Sustainability as core risk management Rather than viewing environmental initiatives as optional marketing costs that can be trimmed during economic downturns, forward-looking businesses treat sustainability as an essential risk management tool. Supply chain continuity: Climate disruption, resource scarcity, and labour issues directly affect operational viability, making sustainability a matter of business survival. Shared industry frameworks: Organisations like Cascale enable collective action and standardised measurement, allowing businesses to address systemic supply chain challenges efficiently. Commercial protection: As regional regulations tighten across Europe, Asia, and North America, compliant supply chains remain commercially viable while unprepared competitors face market exclusion. By grounding sustainability efforts in verifiable data and communicating claims precisely, marketers can navigate regulatory requirements and build lasting stakeholder trust.

As regulators clamp down on exaggerated environmental claims, marketing and communications teams require practical methods to verify their messaging before publication. The responsibility no longer rests solely with consumer-facing brands; it extends throughout the global supply chain. In his work with Cascale and through the development of My Green Comms , Lee Green highlights an essential operational shift: brands are now legally accountable for the environmental claims they inherit from their suppliers and manufacturers. Supply chain claim accountability means that, for example, a consumer brand which repeats a claim of its supplier in an ad must provide verifiable data and certification. Early lessons from the My Green Claims benchmark To understand the prevalence of unsubstantiated claims, Lee initiated a global benchmark analysing live marketing copy across sectors including travel, automotive, mining, and fashion using a structured verification methodology. His results were quite alarming and show the extent of the challenge businesses are facing: 83 live claims evaluated: Drawn from company homepages, promotional materials, and ESG reports. 25 categorised as "do not publish": Over 30% of live claims failed basic credibility checks and posed immediate regulatory risk. 11 fully approved: Only a small minority of claims possessed adequate supporting evidence in their published form. SME vs multinational performance: Less than a 2% difference in average scores between small businesses and global corporations, demonstrating that claim drift affects organisations of all sizes. Four practical verification steps for marketing teams To protect against regulatory action and maintain credibility, Lee recommends that organisations adopt straightforward internal review habits: Conduct the non-comms staff test: Share proposed copy with colleagues outside marketing or legal, such as a receptionist or finance manager. Ask what they take away from the statement. Public enforcement is based on reader interpretation, not internal intent. Apply the 24-hour evidence rule: If supporting documentation or verification data cannot be produced within 24 hours (or within one click on digital channels), the claim is too broad to publish. Embed data leads in copywriting: Involve sustainability leads and data managers directly in the copy creation process rather than treating them as late-stage proofreaders. Avoid absolute language: Take caution with absolute terms like "100% recyclable" or "zero impact." A garment made from recycled polyester may still feature conventional zips, labels, or trims that invalidate absolute statements.

In the evolving landscape of corporate comms, greenwashing is rarely the result of malicious intent. More often than not, it is the product of enthusiasm outstripping accuracy. Speaking on Sustainability Marketing Survival Conversations, Lee Green , VP of Marketing, Communications & Public Affairs at Cascale and founder of My Green Comms , shared insights from his 20-year journey across global communications. From serving as the first editor for PR Newswire in China during the mid-2000s solar boom, to leading comms at the Consumer Goods Forum in Paris and now Cascale, Lee has observed a consistent pattern: the gap between what companies say and what they can prove is where reputational danger lies. The mechanism of claim drift "Most greenwashing that I see isn't cynical," Lee explains. "It's a good company kind of outrunning its own evidence. They've done real work that they're proud of, but in telling the story, as it gets through marketing and legal, it drifts a few degrees past what they can actually back up." Historically, organisations might have escaped scrutiny for minor embellishments. Today, global regulatory frameworks have eliminated that margin for error. For EU members, the Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCo) bans generic environmental claims like "eco-friendly" or "green" without verified proof. In the UK, the Advertising Standards Authority can actively scan tens of millions of online ads annually using automated tools to flag questionable claims. The danger of legacy web pages One of the largest hidden risks for growing businesses and SMEs is forgotten digital content. Web pages, blog posts, or promotional landing pages published three to five years ago remain live and indexable by regulatory scanners. If legacy claims are not audited against current regulatory standards, businesses face formal complaints and financial penalties, regardless of when the copy was originally written. "If you are genuinely trying to do the right thing, clear rules help to punish the bluffers and protect the companies that are making real progress," Lee notes.

Building authentic trust requires far more than signing an online pledge or printing a green badge on a PDF brochure. To establish genuine credibility, organisations need clear editorial governance, transparent processes, and verifiable evidence behind every public statement. Following their initial work creating Green Claims Policies for construction clients, Charlie Martin and his team surveyed employees, customers, board members, and investors. While employees welcomed the structural clarity and customers appreciated the transparency, investors and board members viewed proactive claim governance as a critical ESG risk mitigation strategy. This insight sparked the creation of the Anti-Greenwash Charter . Inside the signatory pipeline Joining the Charter is not an open door for every corporate applicant. Organisations must undergo a structured three-stage validation framework: Stage 1 : Application Vetting: The Charter team reviews the applicant for a history of regulatory issues with bodies like the ASA or CMA. Bad actors seeking to use the Charter for cover are rejected and required to maintain a clean record for up to three years before reapplying. Stage 2 : Signatory Development Phase: Approved organisations execute three foundational tasks: Content Audit : A complete check of static and evergreen material against global standards (the UK CMA Green Claims Code, European EmpCo regulations, US Green Guides, or Australian ACCC guidelines). Policy Publication : Publicly releasing an internal Green Claims Policy that details editorial rules and escalation procedures. Staff Training : Educating key teams on identifying greenwash and enforcing policy governance in daily operations. Stage 3 : Campaign Review Period: Over an initial 12-month period, the Charter conducts periodic, retrospective audits of live marketing campaigns, checking the underlying evidence for every claim made. This rigorous framework ensures that signatories establish an audited, repeatable system for responsible communication.